Tag: sten10

  • Case Study: Designing and delivering development workshops for the NHS

    Case Study: Designing and delivering development workshops for the NHS

    NHS logo
    Sten10 logo
    Healthcare

    Designing and delivering development workshops for the NHS

    How Unseen designed and facilitated a full-day team development workshop for the NHS.

    About the Customer

    Organisation

    NHS

    Industry

    Healthcare

    Use Case

    Team development: building on existing strengths while identifying opportunities to develop further

    Key result

    The workshop set in motion more collaboration, better leveraging of diverse strengths and navigation of any challenges with more understanding and trust.

    Background

    The Communications and Design team at an NHS Trust was at an interesting point in their development. While some team members had worked together for many years, recent additions created an opportunity to intentionally shape how everyone would work together going forwards.

    The team was already delivering high-quality, award-winning work. However, they recognised the value in pausing in this time of change to get to know each other better as individuals, explore how they wanted to work together as a newly formed team, and build on existing strengths while identifying opportunities to develop further. The team needed proper time away from their day-to-day to reflect, connect, and co-create their new ways of working.

    Our solution

    Unseen’s team of organisational psychologists, Sten10, designed and facilitated a full-day team development workshop combining individual reflection, interactive activities, and future-focused planning. The morning session focused on building understanding through exploration of team development stages, helping members normalise the challenges of forming new working relationships.

    The “Manual of Me” activity gave colleagues space to share their working preferences and communication styles, while personality and working styles exercises using Wave Work Roles cards enabled everyone to identify individual strengths and potential blind spots.

    The afternoon moved towards co-creating practical ways of working together. The team reflected on the Trust’s values of being Empowered, Compassionate, Professional, and Inclusive, exploring what these mean in practice for them specifically.

    They established agreements covering communication guidelines, decision-making processes, and accountability. Each team member made personal commitments to turn their insights into action. Throughout the day, we created space for open and sometimes sensitive conversations, allowing team members to raise ideas and concerns in a supportive environment.

    “This was exactly what we needed.”

    Outcome

    The workshop successfully opened up communication and strengthened the sense of being a team. The team gained valuable clarity on colleagues’ working styles and communication preferences, which laid foundations for smoother collaboration.

    The session surfaced honest reflections about both what was working well and where opportunities existed to work even better together, including constructive dialogue about topics such as representation and inclusion, feedback practices, and managing stakeholder relationships.

    The team identified several practical improvements they wanted to implement, including consistent meeting agendas, quarterly face-to-face team days that balance work-focused discussions with informal connection, and more regular conversations about learning and development. To sustain the momentum from the workshop, the team committed to monthly 30-minute check-ins to reflect on what’s working and where friction might come about, rotating “Knowledge Sharing” sessions where members share expertise, and practice feedback sessions to build confidence in constructive challenge.

    The workshop set in motion more collaboration, better leveraging of diverse strengths and navigation of any challenges with more understanding and trust.

    “The day went really well and the feedback has been excellent.”

    Let’s build potential, together

    Share your goals and challenges with our qualified team of assessment experts today.

  • Webinar: Why Candidates Renege: The Psychology of Keeping the Yes

    Webinar: Why Candidates Renege: The Psychology of Keeping the Yes

    Why Candidates Renege

    The Psychology of Keeping the Yes

    Now available on-demand

    In this practical webinar in partnership with Grant Thornton, our experts explore why commitment can become fragile after offer acceptance and what employers can do to create a more connected, confident and consistent pre-joining experience.

    Watch on-demand

    Enter your details to access the recording.

    A candidate accepting your offer is an important step, but it is not the end of the decision-making process. Between accepting and starting, candidates may still be weighing other options, looking for reassurance or questioning whether the role is right for them.

    Drawing on behavioural science, practical examples, and the Grant Thornton team’s experience, our speakers will share four principles for reducing reneges and helping candidates feel ready to join.

    What we’ll explore

    01

    How to create meaningful opportunities for commitment

    Small actions can help candidates invest in their decision. We’ll explore the types of onboarding activities, pre-work, welcome assets and early conversations you can implement to create momentum after offer acceptance.

    02

    How to reduce uncertainty about the role and the experience ahead

    Candidates want clear, practical information about what happens next. We’ll look at how different content and activities can answer questions before they become reasons for a candidate to reconsider.

    03

    Building a sense of belonging

    People are more likely to stay committed when they already feel part of a group. We’ll discuss the value of personal communication, authentic employee stories, early introductions and thoughtfully designed ‘buddy’ relationships.

    04

    Boosting confidence that candidates can succeed

    Some candidates disengage because they are quietly asking themselves whether they can succeed in the role. We’ll discuss what you can do to help candidates feel more prepared to start.



    Watch on-demand

    By the end of the webinar, you’ll be able to

  • Explain the psychological factors that can make post-offer commitment fragile
  • Identify gaps in your current experience between offer acceptance and start date
  • Consider practical ways to create commitment through small, well-timed actions
  • Reflect on which parts of the four-principle framework are strongest in your organisation and which need more attention
  • Meet your hosts

    Hear directly from experts with decades of experience.

    Ben Williams
    Chief Scientist
    Unseen
    Connect on LinkedIn
    Nicola Sullivan
    Partnerships Director
    Unseen
    Connect on LinkedIn
    Holly Pearce
    Talent & Recruitment Experience Manager
    Grant Thornton
    Connect on LinkedIn

    Watch on-demand

    Enter your details to access the recording.

    Watch now
  • Report download: The Science of Assessment Centres

    Report download: The Science of Assessment Centres

    The Science of Assessment Centres
    Part of Unseen’s ‘The Science of…’ series

    The Science of Assessment Centres

    How to deliver better assessment centres through technology and behavioural science.

    Free download

    Get instant access

    Fill in your details to download the full report.

    What’s inside

    Three things the report covers

    Assessment centres influence some of the most important decisions organisations make — who they hire, promote and invest in.

    Learn how, by combining evidence-based assessment principles with behavioural science insights, you can create assessment experiences that are more engaging for candidates, more manageable for assessors, more scalable for organisations, and more defensible from a fairness and validity perspective.

    01

    How behavioural science shapes assessment centre quality, and what that means in practice

    02

    Key principles from behavioural science you can apply to how your assessment centres are designed and run

    03

    The tools you can use to give your assessments psychological defensibility

    The best assessment centres draw on both occupational psychology and behavioural science.

    Ben Williams, Chief Scientist, Unseen Group

    Read the full report

    Discover how to deliver better assessment centres through technology and behavioural science.

    Download free ↑
  • Case Study: Developing bespoke assessments for Toyota GB

    Case Study: Developing bespoke assessments for Toyota GB

    Toyota logo
    Sten10 logo
    Automotive & Manufacturing

    How Toyota GB overhauled their graduate and apprentice assessment processes with Sten10

    Replacing outdated exercises with evidence-based, psychologically informed, bespoke assessment centre tasks relevant to Toyota GB.

    About the Customer

    Organisation

    Toyota GB

    Industry

    Automotive & Manufacturing

    Use Case

    Graduate and apprenticeship assessment

    Strengthening engagement

    Average candidate engagement ratings of 5.48-5.71/6

    Background

    Toyota GB had been using the same exercises for several years which had started to feel dated. Toyota GB was keen to create an updated and even better experience for assessors and candidates.

    Sten10 worked closely with Toyota GB to develop bespoke assessment tasks tailored for graduates and apprentices across various departments, ensuring a uniquely Toyota experience.

    The Challenge

    Toyota spotted an opportunity in their Emerging Talent recruitment process: their assessment exercises could be more up to date, and even more engaging. They also wanted to reflect the company’s modern focus on innovation and sustainability as well as its community feel.

    In a competitive job market, where organisations need to “sell” roles to candidates, Toyota’s exercises fell short. An analysis of candidate data revealed overlaps in tasks intended to measure different competencies, resulting in ineffective evaluation of key behaviours.

    Additionally, Toyota’s transition to their new potential model necessitated a cohesive, unified approach across the organisation.

    Giving feedback to candidates is really important to Toyota and this was a massive, time-hungry task for assessors. We needed to look for a way to provide candidates with useful feedback while saving time for assessors.

    The Solution

    Sten10 worked closely with Toyota stakeholders to develop new group exercises, analysis tasks and interview guides that let Toyota talk to candidates about their innovative and sustainable work, and aligned to their new potential model. We also proposed a new feedback process that would save weeks of time for assessors.

    Tasks

    The new tasks reflected Toyota’s core goals for sustainability and innovation, integrating the One Toyota Potential model.

    Exercises

    Sten10 created multimedia exercises designed to engage all candidates and ensure fair assessment.

    Group exercises were cleverly designed to positively include all candidate equally so quieter and more confident candidates could be assessed equivalently.

    Video

    Incorporated different video “curveballs” in group exercises to challenge candidates’ agility in real-time, making the exercises more engaging and adaptable over time.

    Feedback

    Developed an automated feedback guide for assessors, featuring dynamic feedback statements and practical development tips aligned with the descriptors in Toyota’s potential model.

    Scoring

    Candidates’ scores from the integration session automatically generated relevant feedback, allowing Toyota to provide timely feedback to all candidates, regardless of outcome. The automated system protected assessors’ time by streamlining the feedback process.

    Training

    Sten10 provided comprehensive assessor training on the new exercises, and best practise to make sure every assessor could pick up the exercises and be ready-to-go.

    The Impact

    Quality

    The new exercises were designed by experts to support fair assessment for all candidates regardless of background, whilst providing valuable insights into Toyota’s work environment. Candidates appreciated the opportunity to learn and grow, even if they weren’t selected for a role. Detailed feedback was valued for providing insights into strengths and development areas.

    Brand Perception

    Candidates felt the experience enhanced their perception of Toyota, reinforcing its positive reputation. Being able to reflect the great work that they’re doing, in these exercises was a huge step forwards for Toyota.

    Engagement

    Candidates across the Emerging Talent assessment centres rated important areas about the assessment centres on a 1 – 6 scale:

    “This exercise allowed me to demonstrate my skills and abilities.” 5.48

    “This exercise was engaging.”5.59

    “This exercise felt relevant for the placement I was being considered for.” 5.71

    The candidates felt that they were able to show off their strengths in interesting exercises that felt relevant to them and Toyota.

    Efficiency

    The new feedback process Sten10 developed for Toyota saved approximately 1 hour per candidate. This means that every year, across all of the emerging talent assessment centres Sten10 saves weeks of time for Toyota’s assessors.

    Let’s build potential, together

    Share your goals and challenges with our qualified team of assessment experts today.

  • Case Study: Evolving assessments for Deloitte

    Case Study: Evolving assessments for Deloitte

    Deloitte logo
    Sten10 logo
    Professional services

    Evolving assessments for Deloitte

    With high-volume assessments planned across different regions, Deloitte needed to ensure consistency, objectivity, and reliable candidate differentiation.

    About the Customer

    Organisation

    Deloitte

    Industry

    Professional services

    Use Case

    Validation and updating of assessment scenarios

    Improving outcomes

    Through the design of realistic, relevant, and engaging exercises

    Background

    Deloitte required support from Unseen’s team of organisational psychologists, Sten10, to validate and update 25 assessment scenarios used for evaluating frontline social workers across the UK.

    The Challenge

    With high-volume assessments planned across different regions, they needed to ensure consistency, objectivity, and reliable candidate differentiation (who’s good/ who’s great/ who’s not quite ready).

    The scenarios; comprising role-play and written exercises, required rigorous testing to confirm that marking guides accurately captured observable behaviours aligned to KSS indicators.

    The Solution

    Unseen’s Sten10 team delivered a review and updating process:

    Validation sessions

    We provided two occupational psychologists to work alongside Deloitte’s team across six intensive validation days in Birmingham and London. Each day tested six scenarios with real frontline social workers, allowing us to observe whether marking guides reliably captured the intended behaviours.

    Role Actor Preparation

    We developed standardised two-page background templates and scripted role-play lines (10-15 per scenario) to ensure consistent delivery across all assessments. We trained role actors one-to-one and delivered pre-delivery webinars for both actors and social worker assessors.

    Post-Validation Analysis:

    We recorded and analysed all role plays, systematically reviewing marking guides to assess behaviour frequency, calculate facility values (how easy/ difficult behaviours are for candidates to demonstrate), and confirm candidate differentiation. This approach provided evidence-based justification for each behaviour on the marking guides.

    The Impact

    The Unseen team successfully validated all 25 scenarios within the tight timeframe, delivering refined, objective marking guides backed by empirical evidence.

    The standardised approach ensured consistent assessment delivery across multiple venues, while our detailed analysis confirmed that the scenarios effectively differentiated candidate performance; critical for Deloitte’s high-stakes assessment process and selecting the most suitable candidates.

    Let’s build potential, together

    Share your goals and challenges with our qualified team of assessment experts today.

  • Case study: Creating a bespoke development centre for Sir Robert McAlpine

    Case study: Creating a bespoke development centre for Sir Robert McAlpine

    Sir Robert McAlpine logo
    Sten10 logo
    Construction & civil engineering

    Creating a bespoke development centre for Sir Robert McAlpine

    Sir Robert McAlpine, one of the UK’s leading construction firms, partnered with Unseen’s assessment specialists, Sten10, to identify and select the first cohort of participants for their Future Leaders Programme, delivered in association with Cranfield University.

    About the Customer

    Organisation

    Sir Robert McAlpine

    Industry

    Construction & civil engineering

    Use Case

    Development centre for identification and selection of participants for their Future Leaders Programme

    Improving outcomes

    Through the design of realistic, relevant, and engaging exercises

    Background

    Sir Robert McAlpine (SRM) needed a fair and objective process to select participants for the first cohort of their Future Leaders Programme.

    The Challenge

    Ensuring fairness:

    The process had to be inclusive, avoiding any bias towards construction-specific experience.

    Aligning with real demands:

    Selected individuals needed the resilience, leadership ability and commitment to make the most of the challenging programme at Cranfield and succeed in future senior roles.

    Engaging busy professionals:

    The assessment process had to be rigorous without being overwhelming. It needed to be engaging enough to motivate high-potential candidates to apply and participate fully.

    The Solution

    Sten10 designed a tailored Development Centre (DC) based on SRM’s leadership competency framework, enhanced with input from Cranfield University. The exercises, built around a fictional failing project, were designed to measure behaviours such as problem-solving, collaboration, and resilience. Participants took part in group tasks, presentations and interviews, with clear assessment criteria and trained observers to ensure consistency and fairness.

    Design

    Designing realistic, relevant, and engaging exercises

    Comms

    Creating communication materials and a smooth application process

    Training

    Training assessors to minimise bias and focus on objective behavioural evidence

    Logistics

    Managing the logistics of running multiple, seamless development centres

    Integration

    Facilitating fair integration sessions for selection of final candidates

    “A great experience, Sten10 understood our need and put forward practical solutions in a quick timeframe.”

    The Impact

    Quality

    The Development Centre enabled SRM to identify individuals with genuine leadership potential, not just those who were confident or well-known internally. Cranfield University reported the SRM participants were particularly well-suited and well-prepared for the programme. All participants remained engaged and committed throughout the programme; underlining the effectiveness of the selection process.

    Efficiency

    The process was designed and delivered with precision. A clear assessment matrix, structured integration sessions, and observer training ensured reliable, evidence-based decision-making. Sten10’s attention to logistics meant the development centres ran smoothly and without disruption. SRM benefitted from a streamlined selection process that saved time while maintaining high standards.

    Engagement

    Candidates were motivated by the opportunity and felt supported throughout, thanks to clear application materials and a welcoming information pack. Even those not selected for the programme received personalised feedback, reinforcing SRM’s commitment to development.

    “I believe the process that Sten10 ran was successful in preparing the applicants, but also in selecting the right applicants.”

    Let’s build potential, together

    Share your goals and challenges with our qualified team of assessment experts today.